Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Chair:
-
Jan-Georg Deutsch
(Oxford University)
- Stream:
- Series F: Indigenous Knowledge and Religion
- Location:
- GR 276
Short Abstract
to follow
Long Abstract
to follow
Accepted papers
Session 1Paper long abstract
The paper focuses on a recent Namibian submission to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The charges were grave human rights violations before 1990 and responsibility for people who disappeared during SWAPO’s struggle for independence. One of the four main accused was no other than the first president of the independent republic Sam Nujoma, also often referred to as the “father of the nation”. The submission was filed by a local human rights organization and has triggered fierce reactions from government officials accusing the organization and its director of trying to destabilize the country. The organization insisted that the submission was necessary in bringing justice and holding those responsible for past atrocities to account. However it offered to withdraw the submission if Namibia was to have its own truth commission dealing with SWAPO’s past human rights abuses.
The paper takes the submission and the following public debate as starting point to illustrate how the two opposing sides drew on very different ideas about how to remember the past and what it means to be a (national) hero. Looking at the distinctive ways participants used “reconciliation” to justify their stance will show that the term is far from clear and that “to reconcile” might mean very different things to different people indeed. Finally, the paper argues that the ICC submission is part of a wider and ongoing debate about responsibility, accountability and guilt of all sides in the previous war, which continues to inform present politics and underlies contemporary Namibian society. It thus challenges the widespread notion of Namibia as a “young nation” as present-day national politics and society are very much a product of the past.
Paper long abstract
The antinomy of Human Rights Practices: The Case of Peripheral Populations in Africa discusses concisely the issue of the human rights of marginalized peoples in Africa—particularly the indigenous populace whose population is less than a million—within the following themes: 1.Some general theories of human rights; 2. International human rights instruments relating to the rights of indigenous populations; 3. Marginalized minorities, indigenous peoples and human rights: a brief overview; 4. Human rights of indigenous inhabitants in select countries; and 5. Conclusion.
Generally, in spite of the participation of African nations in the United Nations and the Organization of African Unity—now African Union—that approved instruments for the advancement of the human rights of African peoples, the guardians of the African states, overall, have been unsuccessful in implementing the tenets of the documents they signed for the protection of rights. Moreover, the outcome of this research suggests that African governments seldom respect their national constitutions on the issue of the human rights of minority groups. This political attitude tends to exacerbate political angst and mitigate the quest for peaceful co-existence needed for the agglutination of the sub-national units in the nation-state in particular and African polities in general.