Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

P30


Human infrastructures, humans as infrastructure 
Convenors:
Uri Ansenberg (The Open University of Israel)
Ognjen Kojanić (Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg)
Send message to Convenors
Format:
Panel

Short Abstract:

This panel explores the role of human infrastructures to develop what anthropological thinking on human infrastructures might offer the discipline and the subfield of infrastructure studies.

Long Abstract:

After several decades of anthropological study of infrastructure, this panel invites contributors to move scholarship forward by considering an under-used and under-theorised subfield; human infrastructures. Few developments have been made on Simone’s definition as groups of individuals united by a common goal whose “selves, situations, and bodies bear the responsibility for articulating different locations, resources, and stories into viable opportunities for everyday survival” (2009: 124). Perhaps because of its overlap with cognate terms or because of its “slipperiness” (Edwards 2003: 2); the anthropology of human infrastructures remains underdeveloped.

Research on human infrastructures often centres the ‘common goal’ or “critical mass” around which human infrastructures are formed, revealing the logics by which they conduct the work of infrastructure – facilitating the flow of goods, people, or ideas (Larkin 2013: 328). Simone identifies migrant communities in Johannesburg, South Africa, as acting as “an extensive transactional economy” (2004: 423). Elyachar points to the economic potential of the “phatic connectivity” (2012: 120) and Zuntz’s (2023) research on the infrastructure of human displacement explores the networks by which refugees build their own networks of arrival and survival.

This panel invites contributors to explore the role of human infrastructures in all realms of social life. We seek to develop what anthropological thinking on human infrastructures might offer the discipline and the subfield of infrastructure studies and henceforth move anthropologies of infrastructure in a new direction, embracing both the practicalities of infrastructures as a lens through which to see the world while accepting the slipperiness this entails.

Accepted papers: