Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

P14


Anthropologies of culinary tourism 
Convenors:
Sean Wyer (University of Oxford)
Margaret Neil (University of Oxford)
Send message to Convenors
Chairs:
Sean Wyer (University of Oxford)
Margaret Neil (University of Oxford)
Discussants:
Sean Wyer (University of Oxford)
Margaret Neil (University of Oxford)
Format:
Panel
Transfers:
Open for transfers

Short Abstract:

Culinary tourism raises political and ethical issues that merit anthropological attention. Is it a form of “food colonialism” (Heldke 2003), or can it benefit food producers? How does a site and its cuisine become “destination-worthy” (Kennedy 2023), and what are the effects of this on a locality?

Long Abstract:

Culinary tourism, “the intentional exploratory participation in the foodways of another” (Long 2004), is a fruitful object for ethnographic research, and a paradigmatic example of “anthropology on the move”. It is a topic where two longstanding objects of anthropological study – hospitality and eating – converge. Culinary tourism is growing in an age of mass tourism and “foodies”: “well-informed, discovery-minded, discerning consumers [...] who lead food-focused lives” (Johnston and Baumann 2010). For culinary tourists, food is not incidental to the act of travelling, but a primary motivation. Both eating and travelling are regarded as vehicles for transformation.

An anthropological approach can shed light on central political and ethical issues raised by culinary tourism. How does a site, and its cuisine, become “destination-worthy” (Kennedy 2023), and how can we evaluate the repercussions of this process on a locality? Is an “obsessive interest in [...] the new, the obscure and the exotic” a form of “food colonialism” (Heldke 2003), reproducing and reifying existing hierarchies, or does it produce an industry that benefits food producers? Might it in some instances do both?

Can culinary tourism enable conversations over food, and if so, what kinds of conversations does it facilitate in practice? While philosophical and economic analyses of this phenomenon are valuable, an ethnographic approach has the advantage of centering protagonists in this system: growers, cooks, entrepreneurs, and culinary tourists themselves. Like anthropologies of food more broadly, the anthropology of culinary tourism can tell stories that other methodologies risk leaving untold (Ray 2016).

Accepted papers: