Paper long abstract:

The discussion on decolonising the mind and turning to African indigenous knowledge tends to construct a contradiction between the 'colonial' (bad) and the 'decolonial' (good), as well as between the 'foreign' (bad) and the 'indigenous' (good). However, independent African thinkers have never shied away from taking in elements from abroad into their thinking and have always tried to marry the best elements of indigenous and foreign insights. One therefore wonders if the discussion should not be framed differently: as an examination of which ideas can be seen as empowering, in terms of increasing African agency, and which ideas instead can be seen as disempowering, or inhibiting African agency.

This paper discusses a number of such ideas in two key related areas, the areas of culture and language. In the area of culture, it argues in favour of a view of cultures as value systems that serve as common points of reference to a people. It argues that with such a view and the methods of cross-cultural psychology it is possible in principle to chart new developments in the area of culture in Africa and to devise new policies taking those developments into account. In the area of language, the paper attacks the idea that all 2,000 living languages counted in Africa need to be treated in the same way. It shows that this idea paralyzes the debate and proposes instead a distinction between 'discerned' and 'designed' languages. It proposes five principles that would enable increased use of a limited number of African languages in more and more domains.

Paper Download (201 KB)