Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenors:
-
Marieke van Winden (conference organiser)
(African Studies Centre Leiden)
Samira Zafar (Nuffic)
David van Kampen (Nuffic)
Send message to Convenors
- Stream:
- A: Institutional foundations
- Start time:
- 25 February, 2021 at
Time zone: Europe/Amsterdam
- Session slots:
- 1
Short Abstract:
In this session, we focus on how leading from the south can impact existing knowledge infrastructures, how they affect especially youth and how to amplify their voices by means of international education experiences.
Long Abstract:
International (higher) education and research is changing at an unprecedented pace and intrinsically linked to international relations. New modalities of staff- and student mobility connect with public-private partnerships and research, between countries and across continents. It is necessary that contemporary diplomacy moves in tandem with these developments. Intersecting with the academic dynamic is the multitude of non-governmental actors, societal issues and geo-political trends. With this panel, we seek to develop an understanding of the international dimension of education institutions in Africa, and how the challenges they face in this regard can be addressed. The main focus of the panel will be how education institutions (ranging from TVET to Higher Education) can maximize their potential for international engagement.
Underlying themes are the current state of affairs in education systems, science and innovation systems and the position of universities within Africa as well as continental and regional agencies and their knowledge policies. There will also be attention for so-called knowledge diplomacy and transnational networks, and it will deal with the attempts by European knowledge institutions to change from 'capacity development' to 'co-creation'. Adding to this discussion is the role youth can play in furthering the discussion on decolonizing, holding a firm focus on the fact that they are and have the future.
Central to this session are the following questions:
1) On staff-student mobility: What trade-offs do knowledge institutions need to make to ensure their institutions' future academic strength while adequately addressing the challenge of not having enough staff already? For example, these might include making difficult strategic decisions around which departments, students or faculties to support.
2) The infrastructure paradox: In order to increase capacity of academic and research institutions, it is often said that effective international engagement is necessary. How should this engagement look like? What are the critical parameters for successful international engagement, the actors involved and the actors that hinder such engagement? How can this be applied to TVET and North-South cooperation in education?
3) Recognizing the differences of African and European approaches to knowledge diplomacy, what are best practices and ways to move it forward? What are the pros and cons of further intensifying international academic exchanges?
Accepted papers:
Session 1Paper long abstract:
Contestations over production, democratisation and relevance of knowledge and the heightened consciousness of the need to decolonize universities has emerged as one of the major challenges confronting educational institutions in South Africa. The "decolonial turn" is one of the terms that has been thrown around a lot in debates about reforming higher education, organizing institutions and broader struggles for decolonization of universities in South Africa. This paper considers the question of why the idea of a university has become so highly contested in South Africa through a discussion of "decolonial turn" as an explanatory framework that discerns the wider, long historical, political and cultural set of issues and contexts through which educational institutions and knowledge production emerged. Its principal thesis is that the on-going struggles for decolonization of universities in South Africa are a result of the entanglement of institutions and curriculum in a multiplicity of structures of hierarchies of power that emerged out of long colonial history and shaped knowledge production in complex ways which are not only unique to South Africa. The paper pushes to the fore the argument that the long colonial history which formed a world system had long-term consequences and implications for educational institutions in Africa as a spinal framework to help illuminate an understanding of the broader struggles for decolonization of universities.
Paper long abstract:
Scholarships can open up opportunities for young people from developing countries and building academic capacity, transforming lives and building institutions. Their role in development is recognised as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, in Target 4.b: to expand the availability of scholarships by 2020.
This paper will examine the challenges facing scholarship funders and providers to maximise the impact of scholarships to young people from sub-Saharan Africa. It draws on the knowledge and experience of RUFORUM, an experienced provider of scholarships to young Africans, and Education Sub Saharan Africa (ESSA), whose research has fed directly into the evaluation of SDG 4.b. for UNESCO's 2020 Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report on Education & Inclusion.
ESSA's mapping of 350 scholarship providers and in-depth at the practices of 20 of the top 50 providers shows that as demand for quality Higher Education across Africa surges, scholarships for sub-Saharan African students look to be increasing too. However inclusive development is often not prioritised and many programmes lack focus on impact for young people.
This lack of prioritisation is troubling. RUFORUM's experience points to the fact that inclusive scholarship provision in sub-Saharan Africa requires deliberate effort. It needs a streamlined institutional and policy environment with agile development partners willing to unlearn and re-learn to support co-creating working models. Inclusion will only be achieved with purpose and financing that comes with supportive criteria and looks beyond the narrow outcome of attaining a higher education qualification.
The paper will highlight four common challenges that undermine even some of the best programmes:
1. Inclusive access: are scholarships reaching marginalized groups?
2. Completion rates: are scholarships being delivered in such a way as to enable completion?
3. University engagement: what are effective ways of working between universities, scholarship providers and recipients?
4. Transition to employment: what is the best way to support graduates as they make the transition from education into work?
It will then go onto describe how a group of scholarship providers and funders, based across sub-Saharan Africa, Europe and North America are coming together to build consensus on the shared agenda to increase the impact of scholarships. This agenda for change will be supported by development of benchmarks, establishing good practice and tracking KPIs. We propose that these KPIs, once tried and tested could form the basis of a new global indicator for scholarships, focussed on outcomes for young people.