Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper

Marxist, feminist and postcolonial anthropology in a 21st c. collection: R. Firth’s LSE journey  
Patrick Laviolette (FF, MUNI, Masaryk Univ.)

Send message to Author

Short abstract

Accessing an archive that in many ways is unique to the fabric of Britain’s decolonial history has allowed me to begin graphing ethno-kinships. This has been possible due to a participatory encounter with Firth's family and colleagues, thus re-tracing alternative outlines of our disciplinary methods.

Long abstract

Is there a relationship between talking about developed photos (versus negatives) and then making a link to colonialism and de-colonialism? How can archives, as places of lived sensorial experience, help us ‘unwrite’ and re-write the histories of colonial pasts, so to rethink collection places in a hyper-modern and multi-cultural world? Whose materials are kept? And whose are left behind, destroyed, or erased? Which material is censored or concealed from view – awaiting a time when it’s fine to reveal a different narrative. And who does what during these different phases of storing/storying ethno-biographies.

This presentation shall try to answer some of these questions. Based on short-term access to both personal and professional archives, it offers some shallow musings on a centenarian’s life. I will suggest, however, that as sensory (s)places, archives could be seen as a kind of ‘zone of interest’. In other words, they reveal and conceal layers of disciplined/undisciplined history that can help us (re)tell delicate, sensitive, or taboo stories -- ones existing under the darker recesses of the anthropological/ethnological imagination.

Panel Know25
Unwriting discursive and practiced hegemonies in anthropology
  Session 3 Thursday 5 June, 2025, -