Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper:

Tracks of contention: reconfiguring the political through anti-high-speed rail protest in Italy  
Mateusz Laszczkowski (University of Warsaw)

Paper short abstract:

Focusing on anti-high speed rail protest in Valsusa, Alpine Italy, this paper highlights how infrastructures become foci of political contention. I describe how a 'local' infrastructural conflict is linked up with a critique of globalisation and gives rise to multifaceted political reconfiguration.

Paper long abstract:

This paper explores how engineering infrastructures become foci of political contention in contemporary Europe. Specifically, it draws on ethnographic fieldwork in Valsusa, in Alpine Italy, with residents and activists resisting a high-speed railway construction project. Through this focus, the paper addresses the question of infrastructures' generative roles with regard to social and political relations. I argue that infrastructural conflicts can lead to complex reconfigurations of the political, offering a compelling field of study for political anthropology. The struggle in Valsusa, ongoing since the 1990s, is the most long-running and largest infrastructural conflict in present-day Europe. Contrary to common assumptions, protesters show the railway project is environmentally as well as economically unsustainable, and they denounce it as an expression of illicit interests linking figures in the Italian government to potent industrial and financial actors. Analysing this conflict, I highlight the production and dissemination of technical counter-expertise among activists and show how that knowledge becomes the basis for a political mobilisation that overcomes ideological and lifestyle divides among very diverse groups. The movement brings together mountain farmers and retired workers with liberal middle-class intellectuals and experts, as well as Catholic church-goers with communist squatters and various kinds of anarchists. New kinds of individual and collective militant subjectivities emerge, focused on direct action and a critique of the liberal public sphere and representative democracy. The contestation of the specific infrastructural project becomes a point of departure for constructing alternative models of socio-economic and ecological relationships across scales from the 'local' to the 'global'.

Panel P40
The everyday life of infrastructures
  Session 1 Tuesday 12 December, 2017, -