Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality, and to see the links to virtual rooms.

Accepted Paper:

"We were not heard – all had been decided". Participation in safeguarding of urban heritage.  
Vilhelmína Jónsdóttir (University of Iceland)

Paper short abstract:

Introducing case studies from Iceland, the paper discusses how ethnographic understanding of emotional engagement and attachment to historic sites and urban heritage can contribute to community dialog and involvement in decision-making on the safeguarding of cultural heritage.

Paper long abstract:

People form different attachments to built environment. This applies to places that are seen to embody the past or are commonly regarded as heritage. Though such subjective issues can be seen as foundational for a sense of belonging and community they tend to be ill suited to fit the ways urban areas are managed. Both cultural heritage management and urban planning are highly regulated fields and although participation has become the buzz-word of the day, authorities and specialists dominate all decision-making processes. But how do authorities attempt to incorporate the different attachment and engagement that people form with the urban landscape and cultural heritage into their administrative processes?

The paper introduces an ongoing doctoral research project examining participation with respect to safeguarding cultural heritage of the urban environment. Two different cases from Iceland are examined by way of in-depth interviews and observational fieldwork identifying different perspectives and values people attach to urban heritage. The project also analyses the legal framework around cultural heritage as well as the approaches that authorities take to identify and interpret cultural heritage and its safeguarding.

Drawing on the cases the paper addresses if and how authorities have succeeded or failed to facilitate community dialog and involvement regarding safeguarding of urban heritage. In conclusion, the paper argues that an ethnographically informed understanding of how people engage with and attach meaning to urban heritage is imperative for enhancing participatory model in heritage management, designed to attract and facilitate participation from heritage communities in negotiating the urban landscape.

Panel Heri01b
Revisiting place: sensual encounters with everyday heritage in the urban landscape II
  Session 1 Thursday 16 June, 2022, -