Paper short abstract:

This paper departs from Amerindian epistemologies and develops a perspectival ethnography of industrial North-Western European skilled modes of engaging wild fish.

Paper long abstract:

It explores Amerindian perspectivism as an ethnographic methodology grounded on animic premises: subject or object status are relative and relational, experience is intersubjective; the body is permeable, and its perspectives can be exchanged through tools and mimetic processes. Thus subjectivity is collectively constituted and the fundamental means of knowing, leading to acknowledge subjectivity in others. Documenting a perspectival exchange guided by Shetland fishers trawling for monkfish, the paper focuses on some possible dynamics and affective affordances involved in gutting processes. Gutting is a physically and emotionally taxing labour that involves brief but intimate encounters with responsive beings that may offer effective resistance, affecting fishers or damaging their own value as catch. It entails the possibility of developing an intimate knowledge of fish anatomy, ecology, and behaviour, as well as potentially awareness of fish suffering and fishiness, an empathic quality. The research reveals how Shetland fishers maintain animic modes of learning and being, of understandings of the body and fish. The ethnography presents first-hand insights into ‘relations of trust’, which, albeit widely reported, continue to be dismissed as implausible. These relations and their dynamics are further attested through Shetlands háfwords and other language practices that establish synecdochical relations between fishers and fish, restricting violence and making it endurable. These insights problematise violence, illustrating the social skills of fishing and the political dynamics of predation, suggesting paths towards addressing cruelty.