Accepted Poster

The Need for Equivalence Testing in Economics  
Jack Fitzgerald (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute)

Paper Short Abstract

Replicating 81 articles in top economics journals, I show that 36-63% of estimates defending the average null result fail lenient equivalence tests, implying high Type II error rates. I provide equivalence testing guidelines and software commands to help researchers make more credible null claims.

Paper Abstract

Equivalence testing can provide statistically significant evidence that economic relationships are practically negligible. I demonstrate its necessity in a large-scale reanalysis of estimates defending 135 null claims made in 81 recent articles from top economics journals. 36-63% of estimates defending the average null claim fail lenient equivalence tests. In a prediction platform survey, researchers accurately predict that equivalence testing failure rates will significantly exceed levels which they deem acceptable. Obtaining equivalence testing failure rates that these researchers deem acceptable requires arguing that nearly 75% of published estimates in economics are practically equal to zero. These results imply that Type II error rates are unacceptably high throughout economics, and that many null findings in economics reflect low power rather than truly negligible relationships. I provide economists with guidelines and commands in Stata and R for conducting credible equivalence testing and practical significance testing in future research.

Panel Poster01
Poster session
  Session 1 Tuesday 1 July, 2025, -