Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper

Whose voices speak about the nature in the archive?  
Liina Saarlo (Estonian Literary Museum)

Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

Place-lore has been used for mapping and interpreting the nature. Now it is increasingly used to market a place or to establish conservation restrictions. Archiving enhances the lore’s credibility and significance initiating a process of heritagization. What is the nature of archived narratives?

Paper long abstract

Place-lore — narratives connected to places and toponyms — expresses local and popular, as well as public meanings related to the environment. People have used stories to map the landscape, to make a place feel familiar, to domesticate it. In Estonia, most place-lore is nature-related — connected to natural objects, stones, extraordinary trees, bodies of water, and landscapes. Place-lore has been considered as part of the national heritage and preserved in archives together with oral poetry and fairy tales.

Place-lore is seen as evidence of history; it connects a person to the landscape, and its existence or awareness of it demonstrates a person’s attachment to a place. Nowadays, place-lore increasingly becomes part of discussions, an argument expressing values, used both to market a place in the tourism industry or attention economy, as well as to establish nature conservation restrictions and to oppose industrial production or infrastructural constructions.

Although place-lore is part of community-based communication, archived narratives reach a wider audience and circulation, gaining certain added value. Place-lore stored in archives is considered scholarly verified, as if the folklorist’s attention is a mark of quality that increases the narrative’s credibility and importance. Moreover, archiving itself initiates a process of heritagisation; stories not archived may be dismissed as insignificant.

The presentation discusses who is given a voice when local stories are archived. What is the nature of the narratives that are archived? Does all archived stories hold a similar status in terms of truthfulness or argumentative value? Who gets to decide this?

Panel P28
Archived nature
  Session 1 Tuesday 16 June, 2026, -