Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper:

‛A good and reliable book': the general history ‛Ḥabīb al-siyar' and questions of owner- and readership from the 16th to 19th centuries   
Philip Bockholt (Freie Universität Berlin)

Paper short abstract:

Khvāndamīr's Ḥabīb al-siyar has been copied all over the Persianate world. By having a look at colophons and other paratextual elements contained in hundreds of manuscripts, the questions of when, where, and whom the work was copied for and/or read and possessed by shall be addressed.

Paper long abstract:

Many books of the past are today readily considered "important" or "popular" in the meaning of widely read and studied during a long period. Unfortunately, in most of the cases, this assumption remains without any evidence as the field of manuscript studies on whether and how a work was actually copied and read is still in its beginnings. This paper focuses on one of the major historical narratives of the Persianate world, the general history Ḥabīb al-siyar (Beloved of careers). Written by the Herati court secretary Ghiyās al-Dīn Khvāndamīr in the 1520s, it was copied extensively during three hundert years all over the Persian reading world, i.e. Anatolia, Iran, Central Asia, and the Indian subcontinent. By having a look at colophons, ownership stamps and other paratextual elements contained in hundreds of manuscripts extant today, the questions of when, where, and whom the work was copied for and/or read and possessed by shall be addressed. Connected to this is the important issue of how the actual text had been changed and transmitted by scribes and readers. By analysing these alterations, it is possible to get insights in the different ways the Ḥabīb al-siyar was read and adapted at various places and at various times. This brings up the broader question of what modern researchers might detect when the focus of research shifts from reconstructing "original" texts for an edition to the question of how a text like the Ḥabīb al-siyar was reshaped from the 1520s to the 1850s.

Panel P33
New approaches to manuscript variations in South Asia
  Session 1