Paper short abstract:

This paper analyses the limitations of various concepts of citizenship deployed in explanations of the spread of the Maoist insurgency in India, and critically analyses the relationship between the individual and the state underpinning Maoist tactics.

Paper long abstract:

In recent years, liberal concepts of citizenship have been appropriated in the Indian subcontinent by various sections of the urban bourgeoisie, in particular, left-leaning intellectuals and activists, to make claims off the Indian state on behalf of their poorer rural (sometimes urban) counterparts. In the context of the struggle between the Indian government and the Maoist revolution, citizenship has provided a convenient means for civil liberties groups to articulate a notion of 'the people' as set apart from both the actions and practices of the Indian government as well as the Maoist revolution, while at the same time promoting the reach of the Indian state. Life in Maoist areas, however, reveals the blurred boundaries between the villagers and the Maoists, the historic alienation of the state from people's lives, and as such the limits of liberal notions of citizenship, as evoked by the citizen's rights activists, to analyse the potential of people's relation with the polity. The paper argues that this liberal concept of citizenship ultimately obliterates the spaces for a more radical left politics. As proponents of this extreme left politics, the paper also critically focuses on Maoist tactics in showing up the state and its responsibilities to its citizens, reflecting on the implications of these tactics for their Marxian utopia and the future relationship between the individual and the state in a communist society.