Send message to Authors

Short Abstract

Marine citizen science offers dual benefits of data collection and beneficial volunteer outcomes. Using Q methodology, this study explores the diverse opinions held on the role of marine citizen science in the UK and how this helps bridge the gap between practice and policy.

Abstract

Marine citizen science is a growing field offering opportunities for cost-effective data collection across varying temporal-spatial scales. It is used across many applications in monitoring and conservation efforts and there is growing awareness of positive outcomes for participants including increased connectedness to nature, community building and improving ocean literacy. However, when looking to integrate data sets within marine governance systems or research, projects face considerable barriers limiting the uptake and long-term use of data sets. Understanding how people view the role of marine citizen science projects is therefore essential for informing policy and practice, ensuring marine citizen science projects reach their full potential. Here, we use Q methodology to explore the different viewpoints held on the role of marine citizen science in the UK. Participants (n=22) took part in a structured rank sorting process of predetermined statements (n=31) derived from different opinions voiced about the role of marine citizen science. Combining factor analysis alongside qualitative data from a post-sort interview revealed patterns of consensus and divergence between discourse groups. The identification of key groups allows the differing opinions on the role of marine citizen science to be explored and provide novel insight into the perceived strengths and weakness of marine citizen science. This method demonstrates how understanding different viewpoints on the role of marine citizen science can help provide depth to our understand of the role of marine citizen science and explore opportunities to develop strategies for inclusive and impactful engagement of marine citizen science projects with research and policy.