Accepted Poster

Co-research with adolescents: Reflective processes in health literacy model development  
Sigrid Moick (University of Continuing Education Krems)

Send message to Author

Poster Short Abstract

Reflective processes showed that co-research in health literacy empowered adolescents through co-decision, trust, youth-friendly language, and flexibility. Creative, interactive methods work best, while careful preparation and reflection help address sensitive topics and ensure meaningful engagement

Poster Abstract

Introduction

Joint reflection by researchers and adolescents is key in co-research to address power dynamics, ensure meaningful participation, and improve the quality and relevance of findings. The KoKo-Health project employed a co-research approach with adolescents to develop a health literacy model from youth perspectives and to analyse the applicability of different co-research methods. Young co-researchers selected and implemented various methods including workshops, interviews, focus groups, photovoice, and surveys.

Objectives

This study examined reflection outcomes from youth and adult co-researchers to address: What are the experiences, facilitators, and barriers of co-research in health literacy? How applicable are various co-research methods when working with adolescents?

Methods

Continuous reflection processes were conducted using a self-developed checklist with young co-researchers, adult co-researchers, and supervisory staff. Data collection included focus groups, interviews, thought protocols, surveys, and feedback forms after individual activities and at regular intervals.

Results

The checklist comprised four dimensions: context, collaboration, processes, and impact. Findings show that engagement increases when adolescents co-decide on topics, methods, and communication. Trustful relationships, youth-friendly language, and flexible processes and methods are essential. Co-research with vulnerable groups or sensitive topics requires careful preparation and debriefing. Facilitators include adolescent-friendly communication channels, fair compensation, and adaptable timelines. Barriers include bureaucratic consent forms and risks of over- or under-involvement. Creative methods such as photovoice, peer exchange, and persona-building strengthen interaction, reflection, and motivation.

Conclusion

Co-research with adolescents in health literacy requires preparation, flexibility, and continuous reflection. Self-determination and creative methodological approaches are key success factors

Poster Session Poster01
Poster Session