Send message to Authors

Paper short abstract

What role do mutual assistance networks (reciprocated forms of assistance) play in curtailing the risks arising from an absence of centralized social protection programs and how is the knowledge of other exogenous forms of reprieve (emergency relief) localized in Zimbabwe.

Paper long abstract

This study examined the role of networks and reciprocated assistance in curtailing the risk arising from an absence of centralized social protection programs. Given how non-state interventions constitute a key part of the endogenous networks to social risk reduction, we also explored how the knowledge of exogenous emergency relief is localized and utilized. In examining these issues, in-depth interviews were done with a purposively selected sample of informal workers, their representative associations and development partners. Amongst other factors, the findings showed that (i) informal mutual assistance networks are more adaptive, responsive, inclusive and thus more preferred over exogenous relief – with complementarity between the two being low (ii) ex-post bereavement mutual assistance networks have stronger ties with a more versatile, knowledge sharing centered utility that transcends the circulation/sharing of cash, food, and credit. The findings not only contribute to the scholarship on social welfare rights but also networks in the context of reciprocated assistance and emergency relief.