Send message to Author

Paper short abstract:

This paper transports discussions on the geographies of occupation to the refugee camp and infers that rethinking militarised policing in camps as a form of occupation brings into sharper relief the everyday violence of humanitarian governance.

Paper long abstract:

This paper transports discussions on the geographies of occupation to the refugee camp and infers that rethinking militarised policing in camps as a form of occupation brings into sharper relief the everyday violence of humanitarian governance. While most research on the administration of camps has focused

on the biopolitical control of humanitarian agencies and NGOs that register, sustain, and manage refugee lives in exile, far less is known about the role of the police and paramilitary. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Kakuma refugee camp in northern Kenya, this paper provides an alternative reading of the violent spatialities of the camp, in which Kenya's (post)colonial disposition for militarised state violence has merged indistinguishably with the contemporary securitisation of refugees, and the

humanitarian need for unobstructed management of aid operations. This paper proposes that these converging trajectories have transformed the refugee camp into a zone under military-style occupation: an 'occupied enclave'. In this tightly controlled space, Kenyan police act as enforcers of humanitarian

violence that is inflicted on a civilian population of refugees with precarious life chances and freedom of movement. This is analysed through four domains of occupation - architecture, bureaucracy, physical force, and material extraction - that work in conjunction to produce violent spatial effects of immobility, exclusion, and exception. Revisiting the camp through this lens bridges the gap between the literatures

on humanitarian governance and military occupation and reiterates the continuing importance of enclave spaces for governing mobile and unwanted populations.