Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

Against the rising (and controversial) expectations currently made around hydrogen technologies, the purpose of this study is to gather insights from key stakeholders regarding the different possible hydrogen supply pathways, and compare how these perspectives differ regionally.

Paper long abstract

Expectations and hopes about hydrogen are currently reaching unprecedented levels and efforts to stabilise and institutionalise these expectations are being made. Nevertheless, within the context of a future decarbonised world, the field of hydrogen is subject to uncertainties and different potential future pathways exist. And despite current political and innovation efforts, different national visions and expectations about the role of hydrogen might hinder the coordination and development of a global hydrogen market. The purpose of this study is to gather insights from key stakeholders regarding the different possible hydrogen supply pathways, and compare how these perspectives differ regionally. This is a four-country comparison study, covering the UK, Norway, Spain and Germany as relevant countries involved in the development of a future hydrogen market. This study takes a closer look at the potential hydrogen supply pathways and aims to reveal the different perspectives and preferences of relevant hydrogen stakeholders (from the four countries of study). For that, this paper employs an innovative method known as multi-criteria mapping (MCM). MCM is a deliberative and participatory sustainability appraisal method which aims to accept complexity and “open up” different perspectives, arguments, and assumptions rather than “closing down” and arriving at single best solutions. By analysing and comparing mapping sessions by experts from different countries, the study aims to reveal region-specific perceptions of the sustainability performance of the formulated pathways and provide a basis for decision makers who aim at promoting a hydrogen transition.