to star items.

Accepted Paper

Synthetic Metascience: What are the implications of synthetic data for research practices and cultures?   
Sam Bennett (Durham University)

Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

From specialist algorithms to LLMs, synthetic data is permeating research ecosystems, even positioned as a national asset in the UK's AI Action Plan. This talk examines interplay between synthetic data/models, researchers, and institutional contexts, examining how these shape epistemic cultures.

Paper long abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated synthetic data is permeating science and innovation ecosystems, from shaping the development of novel medical algorithms to forming outputs generated by general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs). Synthetic data is even positioned as a national asset, as illustrated in the UK government’s 2025 AI Action Plan. This talk examines the interplay between the materiality of synthetic data (and models), researcher perspectives and decision-making, and broader institutional contexts and infrastructures, examining how these co-shape practice and policy.

In my discussion of synthetic data, I draw on findings from a UKRI AI metascience fellowship project investigating how synthetic data is reshaping research practices and cultures, “Synthetic Metascience: Tracing Artificial Intelligence-generated epistemic shifts in research practice and cultures". I expand the concept of AI representation coils (Bennett, Catanzariti and Tollon 2025) to synthetic data practices, examining how values, epistemic assumptions and materials/resources interact to form material and epistemic feedback loops. Specifically, I look at how synthetic data shapes epistemic cultures and knowledge-building practices in medical research, and how medical research epistemologies feed into how synthetic data is used and understood. Crucially, I consider how insights from AI metascience research can be translated into practical tools to inform policy and practice.

Traditional Open Panel P198
Critical metascience
  Session 1