Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

There have been massive disruptions in the US research system (and elsewhere) with world-wide consequences. How are European-based researchers making sense of these changes? And what are the consequences for global research? We report on a qualitative study of researchers and research leaders.

Paper long abstract

The US research system finds itself under political attack, both in terms of funding cuts but also a broader climate of hostility and threat. In this situation, many scientists experience a massive direct impact on their research (for example within infectious diseases and climate change) but also substantial indirect effects – including a sense of personal insecurity and fear. We report upon a series of interviews with researchers and research leaders across Europe. How are they making sense of the disruptions to the international research system? And what does this mean for their own research activities?

In terms of the European research system, it is possible to imagine a ‘wait and see’ response – based on the idea that this may be only a temporary phase. One can also anticipate an ‘accommodation’ approach; perhaps changing European policies (for example on diversity) in order to fit with US demands. A third and more radical approach could be labelled ‘adaptation’ as new initiatives emerge which seek to counter-act or re-balance current disruptions. These responses are linked to an assessment of the robustness of the global research system: can it withstand such shocks or will the consequence be irreparable damage to research consortia and infrastructures?

Interviews suggest that the responses of European researchres relate to their assessment of whether this is primarily a US problem or whether similar threats exist within Europe. How do they view the emergence of related populist movements closer to home? And what does this mean for their activities?