Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

Drawing on Stuart Hall, this paper examines the integration of biometrics in the British NHS as a shift from clinical bureaucracy to 'algocracy', excluding marginalised communities from healthcare and weaponising patient medical 'illegibility' and clinical 'ineligibility' for immigration control.

Paper long abstract

The integration of biometric technologies and centralized data infrastructures into the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) is accelerating a dangerous shift from clinical bureaucracy to medical "algocracy." Drawing on Stuart Hall’s method of conjunctural analysis, this paper argues that the deployment of medical surveillance cannot be understood as an isolated technological progression; rather, it represents a specific historical conjuncture where surveillance capitalism, the privatization of public health, and the authoritarian populism of the "Hostile Environment" violently intersect. Examining the integration of Palantir’s Federated Data Platform (FDP) alongside case studies of automated triage and biometric sensors, this study demonstrates how healthcare spaces are articulated as sites of automated border enforcement. Marginalized, racialized, and undocumented communities are systematically excluded through dual mechanisms: clinical illegibility, where biased biometric hardware and NLP algorithms fail to recognize non-normative bodies; and care ineligibility, where automated data-sharing pipelines weaponize patient information for immigration enforcement. By synthesizing recent epidemiological data and grassroots evidence from Medact’s "Patients Not Passports" campaign, this paper illustrates how the "algocratic conjuncture" removes human accountability from medical access. Ultimately, this research argues that treating patient data as a punitive asset destroys the trust-based infrastructure of the NHS, utilizing algorithmic fear to deter vulnerable populations and actively degrading national epidemiological security.