Send message to Author

Short abstract:

Experts evaluate the risks in an urban environment through tangible and measurable indicators, like noise level, structural stability, or pollutant concentrations in the air, water, or soil. However, society adds a small but significant human factor to the debate on risk perception. Here, we instigate a discussion on public risk perception.

Long abstract:

Currently, urban environments represent some of the most intricate human constructs, characterized by layers of complexity that inherently entail various risks and vulnerabilities. Over time, experts have diligently studied these tangible risks and vulnerabilities, proposing strategies to mitigate, prevent, or adapt to various risks and crises. However, as cities continue to evolve in complexity, the influence of public opinion and action becomes increasingly important. Thus, for effective risk and crisis management, it is imperative to include human factor.

The recent study was conducted in Klaipėda city, Lithuania, the third largest city in the country, situated near the Lithuanian-Russian border. Here, risks were evaluated through participatory mapping activities with local communities. Citizens were actively engaged, providing their insights and perspectives on the perceived risks within their city and immediate surroundings. Subsequently, these community-generated insights were juxtaposed with the expertise of professionals in the field, culminating in the creation. The final map shows society’s perceived and expert-evaluated risks and vulnerabilities.

Beyond its scientific implications, such a map could provide suggestions for political and city administrative decisions, shape agendas and direct resources towards areas of heightened concern. By integrating community perspectives with expert knowledge, this approach not only enhances the understanding of urban risks but could also foster a sense of collective ownership and empowerment within the community towards addressing these challenges.