Send message to Author

Short abstract:

I focus on the interrelations between technologies and instrumental reason, which unfold a performative effectiveness (Weizenbaum 1976). On the basis of this level of action, I will ask about options for a new reading of Weizenbaum with Butler.

Long abstract:

I will first examine the interrelationships between technologies and prevailing models of thought with reference to Weizenbaum. He worked out that the development of a tool always involves a model of its application and explains: "The tool [...] thus goes beyond its role as a practical means for certain purposes: it is constitutive for the symbolic re-creation of the world by man." The concept of instrumental reason characterizes the models of thought that dominate this process and reproduce themselves performatively. In 1976, Weizenbaum assumes that people are acting subjects and refers to their social responsibility in terms of reflecting on and shaping power structures. He locates the newness of digital technologies in the implementation of instrumental reason in technological artefacts and their reproduction in their application. In particular, in my opinion, he points out that social conflicts and questions of power cannot be resolved (at least not exclusively) within the model of instrumental reason.

With Weizenbaum, technical artifacts can be understood as systems of rules that create cultural meanings. Actions with them are therefore integrated into discursive processes and are performative in this respect. Technological artifacts do not unfold their power linguistically (Butler), but they become performatively powerful in use, in action, in interaction. Weizenbaum's demand for the assumption of political responsibility is by no means invalidated by Butler. Rather, its conditionality, which is at the same time inherently changeable, must be explored.