Deep ecology clashing with "take-make-dispose" fuels resource depletion & disconnect. Can repair bridge the gap? This study analyzes how self-repairers & non-repairers view nature, resources & sustainability, paving the way for potential shifts in consumption habits.
Long abstract:
Our current "take-make-dispose" model clashes with deep ecology's principles, creating resource depletion, pollution, and a disconnect from the intrinsic value of the natural world. The circular economy proposes a shift towards closed-loop systems yet the general public has different views on the topic. To understand how repair influences views on nature, resources, and sustainability, this study employs semi-structured interviews with two groups: self-repairers and non-repairers. Through purposive sampling 15 participants from diverse backgrounds are recruited. Participants discuss their repair experiences, perceptions of nature and resources, understanding of sustainability, and awareness of the right to repair movement. Thematic analysis is used to identify recurring themes across and within groups, comparing self-repairers' and non-repairers' perspectives on nature, resources, biocentrism, alienation, and sustainability. The findings provide insights into individual behavior, right to repair, and ecological concerns, potentially prompting more responsible consumption practices.