Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
Accepted Paper:
Paper short abstract:
This presentation examines how algorithmic systems undermine human autonomy and subtly reshaping decision-making. It advocates for regulatory approaches that transcend content moderation, focusing on the coupled genesis of human mind and algorithmic techniques.
Paper long abstract:
This presentation analyzes the relationship between human autonomy and the governance structures embedded within pervasive algorithmic systems. Increasing reliance on these systems fosters cognitive and moral dependencies, subtly reshaping decision-making processes. Algorithmic nudging, through recommendations and tailored content, exerts a homogenizing influence that standardizes preferences and limits cognitive horizons under the guise of personalized choice. Citing Bovens (2009), it is highlighted that dependency on external nudges for making decisions can obstruct the development of cognitive and moral autonomy, resulting in infantilisation and reduced personal accountability.
Drawing on Gilbert Simondon's philosophy, the presentation critiques the emphasis of current regulatory frameworks on content moderation as insufficient. It advocates for a holistic and processual approach, investigating the technicities, technical lineages behind algorithmic systems to expose how they curate and present information, influencing systemic thought patterns and decision-making. This analysis would unveil the unthought consequences and reveal the coupled genesis of human mind and algorithmic techniques. Understanding this interplay will allow for new regulatory structures that balance technological innovation with the safeguarding of cognitive autonomy. This proactive approach seeks to maintain individuals' capacity for discerning judgment and ethical decision-making amidst the rapid advancement of algorithmic systems.
Concluding with a provocative question, the presentation invites reflection on the mutual alignment between AI systems and human principles. It questions whether it is solely humans aligning AI to their principles or if, conversely, AI is subtly nudging humans towards its optimal operational paradigms, thereby reshaping our thought and value formation.
Safe spaces of autonomy
Session 1 Thursday 18 July, 2024, -