Log in to star items.
Accepted Contribution
Short abstract
I conduct a Timescapes (Adam 1998) analysis of the legalisation of cultured meat – a technology that seeks to grow meat from cells – to demonstrate how multiple invocations of temporality are used to assert a specific political framing of the technology.
Long abstract
Cultured meat is a technology that seeks to grow meat from cells. From early science fiction imaginaries of the 1880s, to the pronouncements of VC-backed start-ups across the globe today, it has always been positioned as part of a significant reconfiguration of our food and social systems. In this paper I adopt a Timescapes approach (Adam 1998) to analyse the politics of cultured meat’s recent legalisation, first in Singapore, as other countries follow. I analyse how multiple invocations of temporality – far futures, poignant pasts, and prescient presents, - are intersected with practices that mark moments and assert transitions. The paper draws upon fifteen years of research on the cultural politics of cultured meat, based upon a sociological and STS approach using interviews and observations with cultured meat professionals. I focus on how asserted meanings are performed through the construction of specific timelines, by whom, and how, and how this attributes significance to, specifically in this case, 7.03, SST.
“When are we having for dinner”: temporality and the ethico-politics in emerging food technologies
Session 1 Thursday 18 July, 2024, -