Paper short abstract:

Challenging the human-centric science, we explore a multi-species political epistemology, defining beings as "epistemic companions". Our exploration, guided by a non-anthropocentric view, tries to redefine our relationship with the ecosystem for a more inclusive understanding of knowledge.

Paper long abstract:

Today, criticizing the anthropocentric nature of the production of scientific knowledge does not seem far-fetched, nor does the fact of thinking about our vital issues involving other beings more-than-humans. In recent decades, several works have built a critical path on which to travel that has politicized not only the existence of those living and non-living others that make up our planet but, above all, the relationships that we weave with them in this task of composition.

Embarking on this trajectory, we propose a multi-species political epistemology exercise, delving into the role played by other living beings in generating diverse knowledge that does not revolve around the human perspective. Rather than treating them as mere objects or subjects of knowledge, we advocate considering other beings as agencies or assemblages of knowledge, steering clear of the anthropocentric and overly human-centric jargon. We extend an invitation to regard other living beings as epistemic companions—partners in the endeavor to produce a knowledge framework distinct from the conventional human-centric approach.

In this paper, we explore various cases to present a comprehensive set of arguments and dimensions crucial for substantiating our concept of epistemic companions. Our exploration is guided by a non-anthropocentric viewpoint and a relational approach, aiming to synergize efforts in constructing conceptual repertoires that transcend the boundaries of human knowledge. Through this lens, we seek to redefine our engagement with the broader ecosystem, acknowledging the agency and contribution of all entities in shaping a more inclusive and expansive understanding of knowledge.