Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper

Polydisciplinamory?: research-creation and theorypractice between art and anthropology  
Jennifer Clarke (Gray's School of Art, Robert Gordon University)

Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

This paper will problematise the theorisation and definition of art by examining 'research-creation'. Going beyond research by artists as commonly understood, it is the complex intersection of art practice, theoretical concepts, and research, a route into the question of art as 'knowledge forming'.

Paper long abstract

This paper will problematise the theorisation and definition of art by examining 'research-creation'. Going beyond research by artists, as it is commonly understood, I will explore how it is the "complex intersection of art practice, theoretical concepts, and research" as a route into the question of art as 'knowledge forming'.

Given the increasing corporisation of universities, including art schools, experimental pedagogy and research must be defended. The developing notion of 'research-creation' is a means of insisting on, troubling, and valuing knowledge produced through mattering practice and ways of thinking-with in multiple, frictional, productive, modes. Following the feminist artist Natalie Loveless, and what she calls her own 'polydisciplinamory', I will argue that research -creation is not a method, it cannot be 'appropriated'. Research-creation does not describe, explain or represent (it is not ethnographic, as Ingold also argues for anthropology). Creating concepts and problematising them in the same move, it is a thinking-in-movement, "thinking saturated with affect" (Springgay and Truman 2016). It doesn't offer a theory or definition of art because it IS art AND is IS theory: theorypractice. The point of it is the unravelling of ideas about what knowledge is, how it is made and who makes it. This is in alignment with feminist and queer-thinking that asks us to pay attention to who participates, whose labour counts, and which modes of address are given scholarly credence.

I will also present some of my recent 'theorypractice' work, in a para-digital mode - between analogue and digital forms, in conversation, visual artwork, and performance.

Panel P023
Anthropology and Art: on the dynamics and the polemics of situating definitions of 'art' [Anthropology and the Arts network]
  Session 1 Tuesday 21 July, 2020, -