Paper short abstract:

The Villa 31 is a controversially and highly emotionally discussed space. Its special location – situated directly in the wealthy centre of Buenos Aires - brings this informal settlement into the focus of a broader public. Moreover its location is essential for the understanding of the settlement and its functional logic.

Paper long abstract:

Until today the juridical status of the settlement is not decided on/ is uncertain.

Fears, prejudices and the conflict between two alien worlds - the first and the third world - play a major part in the controversy about the settlement's right of existence and the fact that it is presently not accepted. In spite of being broadly woven into the 'formal city' the Villa 31 is not seen o accepted as a part of the city structure; borders and conflict lines exist, which mark an 'inside' and an 'outside'.

How far does the city reach - where does the uncertain space begin?

To understand the relationship between the Villa 31 and the formal city their interdependences, their webbing, and their borders must be shown and read. Because of the prevalent conflicts of interest the controversy between its existing material, and above all its immaterial borders stands in the foreground.

Thesis: "In the long run a consolidation - the real acceptance of the Villa 31 - is only possible if the material as well as the immaterial borders between the settlement and Buenos Aires are questioned."

[Where] do connections, interdependences but also borders between the formal and the informal city exist?

[How] do they manifest on the material and immaterial level?