Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper:

Constructions in and of Berlin: plans, empty spaces, and contested futures  
Gisa Weszkalnys (London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE))

Paper short abstract:

Berlin has been reinventing itself for more than a decade. Numerous schemes have been thought up to bring Berlin’s future into being. Focusing on Alexanderplatz, a controversial square in East Berlin, I explore how incomplete and postponed landscapes and empty spaces speak of futures yet to come.

Paper long abstract:

Berlin is a city that has been busy re-inventing itself for more than a decade. It seems to be at once a place that has fulfilled its purpose and a place of new beginnings. Pipes, cables, roads, and train lines have been reconnected; plans and schemes have been thought up to bring Berlin's future into being. What is to be materialised in the city's landscape is a vision of unity and prosperity. I focus on the planning for Alexanderplatz, a controversial square in East Berlin. In the 1960s, Alexanderplatz was rebuilt as the apogee of 'really existing socialism', foreshadowing a future socialist society. Today, this future does not match planners' vision for a central square in the German capital; and a new one is to be built in its stead. The paper considers various media, including plans, models, and participatory procedures, but questions how successful these are in inculcating in people a specific perception of the future Berlin. I highlight the significance of incomplete and postponed landscapes, and discuss the ways in which people invoke Berlin's unfinished constructions and empty spaces to speak of futures yet to come.

Panel W044
Futurities, on the temporal mediation of landscapes.
  Session 1