Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

The paper reads Nozaki Mado’s novel Titan alongside recent Japanese AI fiction and AI automation discourse to ask what becomes of work, value, and hidden human labor when planetary AI automates production and a post-work Japan is imagined.

Paper long abstract

Recent Japanese fiction has become a key site for thinking about artificial intelligence. For example, Yamamoto Hiroshi’s The Stories of Ibis and Ogawa Issui’s The Lord of the Sands of Time imagine AI robots and android envoys as custodians of history, while Kawakami Hiromi’s Under the Eye of the Big Bird and Enjoe Toh’s Self-Reference ENGINE recast AI as dispersed overseer and self-reflexive text. More recently, Kudan Rie’s Tokyo Sympathy Tower brings these tendencies into everyday life, domestic space, and the writing process itself.

In parallel, “Society 5.0” policy discourse in Japan frames AI and robotics as tools to manage ageing, labor shortages, and overwork, sustaining social reproduction with fewer workers. General debates on AI and work often swing between utopian relief and dystopian dispossession. Against this backdrop, I read Nozaki Mado’s bestselling novel Titan within the ongoing automation debates and technocratic futurism. Bookstores market the novel around the provocation that AI has rendered most human work obsolete, inviting readers to confront the implications of a jobless world. Titan follows an AI-powered android avatar exhausted from endless labor and its human counselor, Naishō Seika, as they investigate the AI’s “malfunction” and refusal of frictionless governance. The novel asks what becomes of “work” when needs are met, scarcity recedes, and labor turns structurally marginal. I argue it complicates anxieties about work and value by imagining post-growth life where work’s centrality persists.

The novel oscillates among three horizons: post-scarcity provisioning; residual market hierarchies that assign status without labor; and machinic control, where optimization overrides human consent. At the same time, it insists on the hidden human labor that underwrites automated abundance, such as the programmers, data workers, and caregivers whose contributions are effaced even in a post-work order. Putting Titan into conversation with contemporary Japanese AI narratives and debates on post-work, basic income, and AI social contracts, the paper shows how Nozaki complicates Anglo-American automation imaginaries and reopens, from a Japanese vantage point, the question of what forms of meaning and solidarity might replace the company and the career as dominant units of belonging.