Timetable
Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
Time zone: Europe/London
Successful applicants only
Each successful applicant will have 45 minutes allocated to them in the Masterclass.
This time will be used to give a short presentation (10 mins), engage with feedback from a discussant (5 mins) and participate in a more general discussion around the issues raised. The aim is for participants to receive excellent, focused feedback, from the experts/discussants and audience members, but also to highlight issues that may be common to other researchers in the audience so we can collectively consider how to address them.
Five sessions will run in parallel from 10:00 – 13:00 on the morning of June 24, chaired by members of the committee that selected the abstracts. Successful applicants must submit a four page paper by June 3, 2025 expanding on their abstract for the discussants to comment on and to share with people attending the Masterclass ahead of the conference.
Experts and discussants will be leading academics who are part of the DSA and/or the University of Bath.
Title: Adaptive Political Economy: Toward a New Paradigm
The conventional paradigm in political economy routinely treats living, complex, adaptive social systems as machine-like objects. This treatment has driven political economists to oversimplify big, complex social processes using mechanical models, or to ignore them altogether. In development, this has led to theoretical dead ends, trivial agendas, or failed public policies. This article proposes an alternative paradigm: adaptive political economy. It recognizes that social systems are complex, not complicated; complexity can be ordered, not messy; and social scientists should be developing the concepts, methods, and theories to illuminate the order of complexity, rather than oversimplifying it. The author illustrates one application of adaptive political economy by mapping the coevolution of economic and institutional change. This approach yields fresh, important conclusions that mechanical, linear models of development have missed, including that market-building institutions look and function differently from market-sustaining ones.
To shape the discussion, read the open access article here. Further reading a review of the essay by Suyash Rai at Carnegie India and an earlier response by Duncan Green at LSE.