Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.
Log in
- Convenor:
-
Teddy Brett
(LSE)
- Location:
- Room 12 (Examination Schools)
- Start time:
- 13 September, 2016 at
Time zone: Europe/London
- Session slots:
- 1
Short Abstract:
We will identify the variables that enable dominant elites to subvert democratic processes in weak states, and the complex challenges confronting different types of civic organisations - NGOs, business associations and armed groups - in doing so in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Uganda.
Long Abstract:
This panel will contribute to the debate about contested or subverted democratic transitions by examining the difficulties confronted by marginalised or excluded groups in creating and managing the representative organisations they need to play an effective role in public politics. We begin with a theoretical paper that presents an analysis of the major challenges to democratisation and how they may be overcome. We then explore these issues by analysing the rise and fall of radical politicised NGOs in Bangladesh; a state-sponsored taxi drivers association in Uganda, and a armed minority group in Indonesia, three countries with contrasting state structures and political histories. We will focus on both the internal power structures, (perverse) incentives and (non) accountability mechanisms that influence and often subvert their relationships with their supporters, and the extent to which and ways in which their relationships with the dominant elites that control the state strengthen or undermine their ability to exercise their political rights. These papers contribute to the important theoretical and policy debates on the political role of civic organisations and their contribution to democratisation.
Accepted papers:
Session 1Paper short abstract:
This paper examines the political role of the radical NGO sub-sector that emerged in Bangladesh to challenge the marginalization of subordinate groups and strengthen democratic processes.
Paper long abstract:
This paper examines the political role of the radical NGO sub-sector that emerged in Bangladesh to challenge the marginalization of subordinate groups and strengthen democratic processes. It first reviews their activities during the military government up to 1990 and subsequent period of electoral democracy, identifying some important achievements, but also the many failures that have eliminated most of them, leaving behind a sector dominated by credit and service delivery organizations. It then explains this decline by focusing on three inter-related factors: (i) an institutional setting dominated by clientalistic structures that have undermined efforts to build horizontal alliances among excluded groups in civil society, or links between NGOs and political parties; (ii) a shift in donor support from mobilization to market-based service delivery agencies; and (iii) internal structures that have generated legitimacy and accountability problems by encouraging elite capture, co-option and personalised leadership in the radical sub-sector in particular. It concludes with some brief reflections on the implications of these failures.
Paper short abstract:
We examine the contested role of Civil society organistions in creating the basis for the representation of excluded groups in democratic transitions, and their role in overcoming the mechanism used by dominant elites to incorporate them in repressive systems.
Paper long abstract:
We provide the theoretical framework for case studies that evaluate attempts by excluded social groups to use representative organisations to increase their ability to access to public politics in late developing countries. It treats their emergence as a response to recent democratic reforms, and the difficulties they have encountered as a function of the tensions created by the continued existence of weak states, clientalistic social and economic relationships and weak organisational capacities. It challenges the excessive optimism that sustained the recent democratic wave, and argues that effective attempts to overcome the disruptions and reversals being experienced by many transitional societies will depend on the ability of these agencies to avoid elite capture by strengthening the accountability mechanisms that link them to their stakeholders, and their ability to challenge entrenched political and economic elites without overturning the political settlements that sustain political order, economic growth and social stability.
Paper short abstract:
This paper explores challenges of representative organisation in democratic transitions, focusing on a transport association in Uganda that became an exploitative mafia.
Paper long abstract:
This paper analyses the rise and decline of the Uganda Taxi Operators and Drivers Association (UTODA) as a lens onto the challenges of representative organisation and democratisation in Uganda. Through this case, the article examines how organisational forms that appear to represent large constituencies can actually exclude and exploit them, bolstering the power and wealth of political-economic elites, consolidating authoritarian domination and generating anti-democratic impulses that reverse earlier democratic gains. Challenging conventional understandings of 'elite capture', it argues that UTODA's organisational power evolved through processes conceptualised as 'double capture', which can only be understood by scrutinising the complex evolving relationship between the association and the state over time.
Paper short abstract:
Using Tilly’s ‘democratisation as process’, this paper analyses how a farmers’ cooperative and a research NGO have negotiated the neo-patrimonial context of Western Uganda to advance the interests of smallholders in the region.
Paper long abstract:
How to achieve democratisation in the neo-patrimonial and agrarian environments that predominate in sub-Saharan Africa continues to present a challenge for both development theory and practice. Drawing on intensive fieldwork in Western Uganda, this paper argues that Charles Tilly’s ‘democratisation as process’ provides us with an enabling framework to explain the ways in which particular kinds of association can advance democratisation from below. Moving beyond the current focus on how elite-bargaining and certain associational forms may contribute to liberal forms of democracy, this approach helps identify the intermediate mechanisms involved in building democracy from below, including challenging categorical inequalities, notably through the role of producer groups; contributing to the integration of segregated trust networks; and building cross-class alliances and synergistic relations between civil and political society. The research findings suggest routes for supporting local efforts to build democracy from below in sub-Saharan Africa.