Click the star to add/remove an item to/from your individual schedule.
You need to be logged in to avail of this functionality.

Accepted Paper

Successful socialist verticality in the wild capitalist urban age  
Michał Murawski (University College London)

Paper short abstract

This paper considers the distinction between high-rise architecture in different political-economic regimes. What is the difference between state socialist, welfarist and wild capitalist verticality? Is the high-rise form inherently 'inhumane', or does it have progressive value?

Paper long abstract

It is time, this paper argues, to re-orient our understanding of the architectural legacies of progressive high modernism (whether in its state socialist or welfare-statist incarnations): from a failure-centric lens, to a success-centric one; further, this paper moves towards a definition of socialist verticality, and to consider its fates in the 'wild capitalist' urban condition of today. 'Wild capitalism' is an emic term used throughout the post-socialist world to refer to the supposedly 'immature' years of capitalism's infancy during the 1990s. Far from being a thing of the past, I argue, 'wild capitalism' can be deployed as a heuristic through which to make sense of the global urban condition in the 21st century.

This paper considers the distinction between high-rise architecture in different political-economic regimes. What is the difference between state socialist, welfarist and wild capitalist verticality? Is the high-rise form inherently 'inhumane', or does it have progressive value? What is the connection between architectural verticality, centrality and monumentality? This paper surveys a range of ethnographic material, focusing on: the Palace of Culture and Science in Warsaw, a Stalinist skyscraper today emanating a subversive 'still-socialist' 'public spirit' over its wild capitalist host city; on elite Stalinist high-rise residential architecture in Moscow and its contemporary fates; on the Soviet Constructivist idea of the 'social condenser' and its possible high-rise incarnations, from Moscow to New York; on the tragic fate of high-rise council housing in wild capitalist London, from Grenfell to Aylesbury; and on the contested replacement of low-rise (five-storey) Khrushchev-era housing with developer-built high-rise architecture in wild capitalist Moscow.

Panel Env03
Tower block failures: high-rise anthropology
  Session 1