Send message to Author

Paper short abstract

This paper focuses on the methodological dynamics of "insider" anthropology conducted within Pacific Islander communities and examines the circumstances under which insider anthropologists must negotiate a path that balances their personal identities and their professional identities as anthropologists.

Paper long abstract

In conducting anthropology as a member of the community that is the focus of the study, questions of personal and professional identity often arise. There are both advantages and disadvantages to this positioning and I draw on my experiences as an anthropologist of New Zealand and New Guinea Islander descent to explain this point. This paper explores the boundaries of insider and outsiderness; examines the postcolonial sociopolitics of "insider" anthropology in the Pacific region; and analyses the broad intersections between race, family, culture and anthropological practice. These themes highlight the moral decisions some anthropologists must navigate in order to strike a balance between entwined personal and professional identities.

In this paper, I define "Pacific Islander" as any person of Melanesian, Micronesian or Polynesian descent. I use this term (rather than a more concise national of ethnic category e.g. Fijian, Ngati Whatua, ni-Vanuatu) because this paper stems largely from my recent postdoctoral research on diasporic, panethnic Pacific Islander identity, and this term's encompassing nature enables me to draw on the spectrum of encounters I experienced during my fieldwork in Australia, Hawaii, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.